Quality in California
  • Blog
  • Discussion Forum
  • Test Method Updates
  • Caltrans Section 39 Updates
  • Need a Soap Box?
  • Superpave

Discussion Forum

Quality in California
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Search This Blog

Topics

  • AASHTO (5)
  • Aggregate Plant (4)
  • AMRL (5)
  • Asphalt (21)
  • Asphalt Binder (7)
  • Asphalt Plant (10)
  • ASTM (3)
  • Batch Plant (6)
  • Bias (1)
  • Caltrans (61)
  • certification (14)
  • Cleanliness Value (3)
  • Coarse Sample (5)
  • Communication (4)
  • Compaction (6)
  • Concrete (2)
  • Construction (17)
  • credibility (2)
  • Crumb Rubber (1)
  • Drum Plant (4)
  • Dry Batch (4)
  • English Units (1)
  • Fine Sample (4)
  • Forensics (5)
  • Geology (1)
  • Gradation (9)
  • High AC Content (2)
  • IA (8)
  • Improper Coating (3)
  • independent assurance (12)
  • laboratory (37)
  • Load Out (1)
  • Low AC Content (2)
  • Maintenance (7)
  • Mineral Filler (2)
  • Mix Designs (2)
  • New Ideas (6)
  • Particle Shape (1)
  • Pavement (15)
  • Polymer-Modified Asphalt Binder (1)
  • Precision (1)
  • quality (51)
  • RAP (6)
  • Recycling (6)
  • Repairs (5)
  • Research (2)
  • RHMA-G (3)
  • RSP (8)
  • Rubber Asphalt Binder (2)
  • Sand Equivalent (4)
  • Screens (4)
  • Size (2)
  • Solutions (12)
  • Specifications (15)
  • Superpave (7)
  • Test Method Updates (16)
  • Test Methods (22)
  • Test Results (15)
  • Warm Mix Asphalt (5)

This website is a way for me to share my experiences and things that I've learned over the years as an engineer in the aggregate and asphalt industry of California.


Questions?
Comments?
Complaints?

Contact me at:

Toni@QualityInCalifornia.com


Subscribe by Email

Photobucket

Follow Us!

Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (13)
    • ▼  September (1)
      • Caltrans' 2010 Construction Standards Webinar
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2012 (38)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (7)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2011 (55)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (16)
    • ►  April (7)

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed in this blog are those of the author(s) and of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the official position of any company, association, industry or government entity. Further, although the editor of this blog makes every effort to report on information from authoritative sources, and will often provide links to source material as a reference, no warranties on the information presented on this blog are expressed or implied, nor is the author responsible for the accuracy of the information provided in the source material. Readers are strongly urged to use sound engineering judgment and refer to established specifications, contract documents and authoritative reference materials on matters related to construction materials in general and public works projects in particular.
Powered by Blogger.